Our Deaths Don’t Count For More

An important post over at The Daily Beast “Open Zion” by Emily Hauser

After a quarter of a century of living the conflict, studying the conflict, reporting on and writing about the conflict, it has been my impression that everyone on earth knows that Israel and the Israelis suffer from horrible violence…

What the world—including far, far too many Israeli and Diaspora Jews—manages to not consider is that allowing the deaths (by intent, indifference, or incompetence) of massive numbers of Palestinian civilians is no more acceptable than Israel’s own suffering…

Read the full article here

One Man’s Accountability is Another’s “Diplomatic Terror”

An ironic set of reporting over the weekend dealing with how the Israeli government deals with Human Rights investigations on itself and how pro-Israel supporters praise others for looking into the PA’s record.

Calev Myers, of the Jerusalem Institute of Justice traveled to Brussels on Thursday to hand the European Union a report urging future aid be based on the Palestinian Authority improving the human rights of Palestinians. According to their website:

Myers traveled to Brussels to personally hand the EU a 35-page report that his organization, the Jerusalem Institute of Justice, compiled on human rights in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

It urged the EU to hold the PA and Hamas accountable for its human rights obligations under international law, which are only marginally influenced by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Asking donors to look into the human rights conditions and accountability is a good thing. No matter who it is. The Palestinian Authority, like all governments should be held to account for how it treats it’s citizens. It’s also good to be held accountable to International Law. But one must remember a simple fact. The Israelis are the ones in power in the West Bank. Is this taken into account as well? Are the Human Rights abuses perpetrated by Israeli polices accounted for in Mr. Myers report? More on that later.

However, back in Jerusalem…Haaretz reported on Sunday that:

Israel is considering sanctions against the Palestinian Authority after the United Nations’ Human Rights Council decided to establish an international investigative committee on the West Bank settlements.”

Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman called it “diplomatic terror” and on Sunday evening Foreign Minster Danny Ayalon tweeted that the UN team would not be allowed into Israel:

Article here.

No matter what you think of the UN or it’s different bodies, Israel’s human rights record in the Occupied Territories needs more attention. According to B’tselem (Israeli Human Rights Organization) 2011 Human Rights Report. When dealing with Settlements:

The settlements violate numerous human rights of the Palestinians, among them the right to property, the right to an adequate standard and living, and the right to freedom of movement.

So while Israeli Human Rights lawyers are in Brussels asking that any future funding be contingent on the Palestinian Authority’s Human Rights efforts. The Israeli government calls such actions “diplomatic terror” and shuts the doors to any international accountability looking into it’s human rights record and the settlements.

You can’t demand accountability from others while rejecting calls for the same on yourself.

On the ‘invented’ Palestinian people—and other absurd comments

This is a cross-post from +972Magazine

by Omar Rahman

Republican candidates in the 2012 primary race have topped each other in inflammatory remarks regarding Palestinians. Ever so often I am bombarded by so many words that almost none come at all and I pass up the opportunity to tackle a certain subject.

This was the case recently with a spate of utterly ridiculous—almost comical—statements from candidates for the Republican primary race in the United States about Palestine and Palestinians, but in the end I had to say something. First there was Mike Huckabee, who came out in support of the building of illegal Jewish settlements in the West Bank. Then there was Rick Santorum’s statement that there were no Palestinians in the West Bank, only Israelis, and that the entire land belonged to Israel (more on this later). Then there was Herman Cain, well, Herman Cain’s statements were so inane they are not worth describing. Finally, we have Newt Gingrich, the self-proclaimed ‘historian’ who has stated that Palestinians are a fictitious people and that they are all just ‘terrorists’ anyway.

In what has become a ritual for American politicians to outdo each other over who can be the most pro-Israel, the journey for national public office clearly runs through the Holy Land, or at least its Washington address at the AIPAC/WINEP headquarters. This is obviously nothing new; Israel has been a domestic issue in American politics—like the economy, healthcare, education, etc.— for decades.

What is shameless and worrisome are the depths that candidates are now willing to go to in their public statements, sounding more like neo-Nazi demagogues as they deny an entire people’s place in the world than politicians trying to get elected by playing up to an important domestic constituency.

Gingrich, in an interview with the Jewish Channel, stated that Palestinians were an ‘invented’ people and then went on to defend his fallacious remarks in a publicized debate. His comments, which go much further, demonstrate a fundamental ignorance of the history of the region, a blindness to the history of nationalism in general, and a callousness to anyone besides the right-wing Jewish community. Gingrich would be wise to study the history of how every nation was formed—particularly America. The Republican frontrunner went on to say that Palestinians are really just Arabs, as if he was revealing some great truth that we all failed to see. I wonder if he advocates a pan-Arab state that does away with identities such as Egyptian, Syrian, and Iraq—which all emerged out of the Ottoman Empire—or the nineteen other states that make up the Arab League, because he believes they are all in fact ‘invented.’

Santorum’s comments were equally erroneous but were funny in the unintended consequences of Santorum’s thinking—or lack thereof. In saying that the West Bank is Israeli and equating it to America’s conquering of Texas and New Mexico, Israel would then be obliged to offer citizenship to all Palestinians living between the ‘River and the Sea.’ I guarantee this is not something that Santorum’s AIPAC policy advisors would want, but the logical argument—as it was computed in Santorum’s head—is telling.
These politicians become so focused on satisfying a microscopic group of individuals on the grand scale of things that they forget the entire world is beaming in to hear them speak. Who could ever take American peacemaking efforts seriously when these are the type of people running for the highest office in the land?

In some ways I am actually happy about it because I would like the veil of honesty to be stripped away from US intentions in the Middle East. The more the United States contradicts its own policy regarding Palestine at the United Nations and its officials make fools of themselves, the more the US isolates itself and Israel from the global community over this issue. It is only when the American-led ‘peace process’ is dead and abandoned that we can start looking for better solutions elsewhere, and Israel will have to look seriously at its place in the region.

Original article here at +972Magazine

TV Debate: “Has the Church Replaced Israel?”

Last week Dr. Stephen Sizer, vicar of Christ Church in Virginia Water, UK debated Dr. Calvin Smith of of Kings Evangelical Divinity School on Revelation TV. Below is the full debate.

Personally I thought the title of the debate was offset. It would seem by that title that one would argue for and one against when neither Dr. Sizer or Dr. Smith take up the position that “the church has replaced Israel”. The two men do have very different theological viewpoints. The debate should have been called: “Who are the people of God?” Either way, it is a good and educational watch:

Replacing the Peace Narrative with Discussion of Rights

Wednesday, November 9 2011 | Joseph Dana

Cross-post from: +972Magazine

Non-violent methods being used by Palestinians and their international supporters are helping to reframe the conflict from a discussion of peace vs. violence, into a struggle for rights under Israeli occupation.

Next week, a group of young Palestinians will board Israeli settler buses in the West Bank with the intention of traveling to East Jerusalem. The activists will likely be greeted by fully armed Israeli settlers, as well as soldiers. The threat of Israeli violence has not deterred Palestinians who maintain that they are prepared to pay a price to highlight Israel’s segregationist policies in the West Bank.

While not officially segregated, Israeli bus lines often pass through Jewish-only settlements which dot the rugged West Bank landscape. Palestinian entry to Jewish settlements is strictly forbidden, unless, of course, Palestinians are engaged in construction of the settlements, most of which are considered illegal under international law.

The upcoming protest event is being labelled by organisers as the Palestinian “Freedom Rides”. In the early 1960s, white and black activists boarded segregated buses in the American south in an effort to draw attention to the racism of Jim Crow legislation. The protests caused panic in the south and helped chip away at segregation in the US. Palestinian organisers hope that the same effect will take place in the West Bank although they understand that their battle begins with challenging the narrative of the conflict.

Read the full article at: +972Magazine

Netanyahu’s “Peace” According to the Likud Party Charter

The recent Palestinian UN bid and this weeks Palestinian acceptance to UNESCO has once again put the “Peace Process” front and center. Listening to Netanyahu and the U.S. Administration, getting the Israelis and Palestinians “back to the negotiating table” is the utmost priority for a lasting peace deal.

Although Netanyahu plays the part, the details of his party platform need to be taken into account as a “peace partner” to show the reality behind the circus.

Likud Party Charter states:

a. “The Jordan river will be the permanent eastern border of the State of Israel.”

b. “Jerusalem is the eternal, united capital of the State of Israel and only of Israel. The government will flatly reject Palestinian proposals to divide Jerusalem”

c. “The Government of Israel flatly rejects the establishment of a Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan river.”

d. “The Jewish communities in Judea, Samaria and Gaza are the realization of Zionist values. Settlement of the land is a clear expression of the unassailable right of the Jewish people to the Land of Israel and constitutes an important asset in the defense of the vital interests of the State of Israel. The Likud will continue to strengthen and develop these communities and will prevent their uprooting.”

So while Netanyahu wants no pre-conditions from the Palestinians going into “negotiations” his party charter and ideology says otherwise.

Likud Party Charter

Photo Essay: Rush hour at Bethlehem Checkpoint

Last summer I did a photo essay for +972 Magazine in Israel.

Bethlehem, West Bank – Thursday, June 30, 2011. I set my alarm for 4:45 AM and headed out of Jerusalem to take some video at the Bethlehem checkpoint for an upcoming project.

Jerusalem was still very quite, a stark difference for what was awaiting in the nearby Palestinian Bethlehem. As I crossed over into the city you could hear the voices of thousands of people lined up both in the terminal and awaiting access. This is morning “rush hour” in Bethlehem Checkpoint.

Full article here

Rep. Eric Cantor’s Racist and Dehumanizing AIPAC Comments

Today at the AIPAC conference in Washington D.C.; House Majority Leader and Republican Eric Cantor blamed “the culture” of the Palestinians and the broader Arab world as the source of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

“Sadly, it is a culture infused with resentment and hatred. But it is this culture that underlies the Palestinians and the broader Arab world’s refusal to accept Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state. And this is the root of the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. It is not about the ’67 lines”.

Imagine the backlash if a standing member of Congress or the media (or anyone) made such claims against the Jewish culture? But today, hardly a word. Such broad based racist comments should never be made about any culture or people.

Eric Cantor should issue an immediate apology to the Palestinians and Arabs everywhere. AIPAC should denounce such comments made on their stage.

Seattle Metro Transit Reverses Course on Bus Ads on Israeli War Crimes

The Seattle Metro Transit was set to allow an advertisement by Seattle Mideast Awareness Campaign to run on 12 buses starting next week. Several Zionist and Christian Zionists groups opposed the advertisement and found little success in changing the minds of the Seattle Metro. Although their lawyers advised them that it couldn’t refuse to accept the “Israeli war crimes” ad under current agency policy – yesterday in a turn of events the Seattle Metro reversed it’s decisions after it said:

“When we accepted the ad from Seattle Mideast Awareness Campaign, we didn’t have any information to cause us to reasonably foresee that there could be a disruption to transit service,” Thielke said.

That changed once media locally, nationally and internationally ran the story and the comments started coming in, Thielke said. Metro customer service has received about 3,000 e-mails, and local elected officials thousands more.

That made officials concerned that running the ads “could’ve caused anything from vandalism to protests that met the buses,” she said.

King County Executive Dow Constantine went on to say:

“The escalation of this issue from one of 12 local bus placards to a widespread and often vitriolic international debate introduces new and significant security concerns that compel reassessment”

So although some groups are claiming victory – what can be read between the lines here is that the threat of vandalism and possible security concerns for passengers from these groups were enough of a concern to pull the advertisements. Shows the length some will go to in able to suppress the truth of the use of some American tax dollars.

Links:
The Seattle Times Story
Mondoweiss

53% of Israeli Jews believe the state has the right to encourage Arab citizens to emigrate

Haaretz is a reporting on a new study by the “Israel Democratic Institute” and here are some of the “Highlights”:

1. 62% of Israeli Jewish respondents also said that as long as conflict with the Palestinians continued, the state should not take into account Israeli Arab opinions regarding foreign policy.

2. 53% of Israeli Jews believe the state has the right to encourage Arab citizens to emigrate.

3. 55% said Jewish cities should receive more government resources than Arab communities.

Full article here